How do you feel about Mythic nerfing WHs in 1.2?

[Question]

How do you feel about Mythic nerfing WHs in 1.2?

[pan1x]

Time to roll slayer/choppa or quit.

[Question]

Only one who voted that WHs deserved the nerf was a witch elf. Lol more witch elves trolling the WH forums. Fantastic.

[Affection]

I don't understand the people who would vote "time to roll a slayer" so the same thing can happen to them again? So they can repeat the leveling process again? So they can get attached to a class only to have it nerfed? And then repeat it again, ad naseum?

Bleh

Good work on WH's Mythic

[Murggath]

No need to rush... the patch is still in public test server and it can be changed, so you can go on there and vote that they do not nerf WH's

[HeatPhalanx]

Yep, that'll be the last resort. But I doubt it will get us what we need, which is the Str/Bal/MeleeCrit/RangedCrit fix, a mirror of Increased Pain, a mirror of WE kisses and a mirror of Frenzied Mayhem. Even if Mythic listen to us, we might not even get one of those.

[parz]

well...

we'll see how it works out with absorb shields buffed and our dmg nerfed. we'll see when patch 1.2 is live, no use in whining before its even there.

if the nerf is not too hard im really ok with it.
imo WH's can do great in 1v1 (against all classes with a few exceptions) and 1v2, great in 6v6 premade fights, good in scenarios. keepsieges and large scale rvr not so great, but keep sieges will be a lot more fun with pick lock i guess, and well... large scale rvr just sucks for MDPS as its a range ae-fest.

[alucardr]

Any reduction in damage to WH will destroy the class, period.

[Kenyan]

Sharing the same nerfs with a career we were not on the same level with to begin with is a heavyhanded and poor decision if balance is really the intended goal.

Though it's clear by this point that balance is in fact not intended. Back and forth nerfing power shifts to get people to reroll and throw more subscription dollars to the beast.

Don't worry, one of the top Mythic folks plays a WH.

[MuntarDrake]

When you say plays a Witch Hunter, do you mean plays a Witch Hunter in Warhammer Online: Age of Reckoning, or plays a Witch Hunter in LARP?

[Kenyan]

Originally Posted by MuntarDrake

When you say plays a Witch Hunter, do you mean plays a Witch Hunter in Warhammer Online: Age of Reckoning, or plays a Witch Hunter in LARP?

WAR apparently. In one of the recent publicity YouTube things he says he got his Conqueror Shankboots. AH I guess, since someone playing a WH in t4 would likely have had the 1.2 changes tailored to fit the WE and WH a little more properly instead of the same changes across the board.

[PaiHuShi]

If the current notes are the end result to the patch I will not be playing warhammer beyond the next sub month. I'd like to say its a huge deal, but it isn't really.

although it was/is nice playing a game you can lvl with during pvp I have never gotten fully attatched to Warhammer.

The WH class is nice, and fun, sc lvling is somewhat neat but getting old, and Orvr is just so-so imo. Keeps/forts are a complete bore (or lagfest) and the pve is completely laughale and bugged to high heck. I know you don't play this game for pve, but thats no excuse for the current state of pve.

I honestly just wish there was a decent alternative PvP mmo thats current to go to. As it is CoH/X is the only thing I can think of.

~Jin

[Poodle]

though i don't think the nerfs are that bad, i think it's an insult that they even nerf us at all.

No way do we deserve to get nerfed, we need a buff badly not this.

huge misstake by mythic

[lightertripod]

class is very gear dependent to begin with any drop in DPS is going to hurt since most WH struggle to get the balance of stats to get DPS to get the job done while actually living throu an encounter

as it is we are a DPS class that only has DPS vs x and why Z we not make dent on

[Question]

LOL i check the poll results and more witch elves voting that WH deserved nerfs or are neutral to it.